Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Scaphoid Fracture

Derived from the ACOEM Hand, Wrist and Forearm Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 25628, 25645. ICD-10 S62.0.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Required

  • Scaphoid fracture with displacement stated

    Surgical fixation of displaced scaphoid fractures is recommended. — p. 278

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgical fixation of a displaced scaphoid fracture

Recommended. Surgical fixation of displaced scaphoid fractures is recommended.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · confidence high · p. 278

Indications — required:

  • Displaced fracture, fixation requested

    Surgical fixation of displaced scaphoid fractures is recommended. — p. 278

High confidence. Displacement is the whole criterion — the guideline says displaced fractures are believed to require fixation. Quote the displacement from the report.

Surgical fixation of a non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fracture for a patient requiring earlier functional recovery

Recommended. Surgical intervention of treatment of non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures is recommended for patients requiring earlier functional recovery.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Evidence (C) · confidence low · p. 279

Indications — required:

  • Patient requires earlier functional recovery, cannot or does not wish to attempt non-operative treatment

    Indications Patients with non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures who cannot or do not wish to be treated with an attempt at non-operative treatment. This includes athletes. — p. 279

The SAME fracture has two opposite recommendations in this chapter, separated only by whether the patient requires earlier functional recovery. This is the supported half. Document why early recovery is required — the guideline names athletes and patients unable to tolerate prolonged immobilisation, and in an occupational claim the job demands make the same argument.

Surgical fixation of a non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fracture for all other patients

Not Recommended. Surgical intervention for treatment of non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures is not recommended for all other patients.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Evidence (C) · confidence low · p. 280

Indications — required:

  • Non-displaced fracture, patient not requiring earlier functional recovery

    Surgical intervention for treatment of non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures is not recommended for all other patients. — p. 280

Not recommended for patients who do NOT require earlier functional recovery — the guideline records no quality evidence of improved long-term outcomes with surgery for non-displaced fractures. Before filing, ask whether this patient genuinely needs early recovery: if so, the other recommendation supports the same operation.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?