Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication

Derived from the ACOEM Low Back Disorders Guideline, edition 13 February 2020, as adopted into the California MTUS 23 November 2021. CPT 63047, 63048, 63005, 63012, 22612, 22633. ICD-10 M48.061, M48.062, M48.07, M99.63.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Presumptive Diagnosis

Required

  • Radicular-type pain involving usually multiple dermatomes with pain and/or numbness, or myotomal muscle weakness, all consistent with the nerve root levels affected

    radicular-type pain involving usually multiple dermatomes with pain and/or numbness, or myotomal muscle weakness all consistent with the nerve root levels affected — p. 169

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Required

  • MRI, or CT with or without myelography, confirming spinal stenosis and corroborating the dermatomal and myotomal findings predicted by the history and clinical examination

    imaging findings by MRI, or CT with or without myelography that confirm spinal stenosis and corroborate the dermatomal and myotomal findings predicted by the history and clinical examination — p. 169

Conservative Care

Any one of the following

  • Continued significant pain and functional limitation after at least 4 to 6 weeks of appropriate non-operative therapyat least 4 weeks

    pain and functional limitation after at least 4 to 6 weeks of time and appropriate non-operative therapy that usually includes flexion exercises plus aerobic exercise (walking or cycling), and NSAIDs. — p. 170

  • OR

    Progressive neurological deficit (a separate indication — the trial of therapy does not apply)

    Progressive neurological deficits are considered a separate indication. — p. 170

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Decompression surgery for spinal stenosis (laminectomy, laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, facetectomy, posterior decompression)

Moderately Recommended. Decompression surgery is moderately recommended as an effective treatment for patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis (neurogenic claudication) that is intractable to conservative management.

Strength of Evidence — Moderately Recommended, Evidence (B) · confidence moderate · p. 169

Indications — all of the following:

  • All three indications above are documented

    Indications – All of the following should be present: — p. 169

  • AND

    If the patient is elderly with multiple comorbidities, the guideline's caution has been addressed

    Caution is warranted among elderly with multiple comorbidities. — p. 169

Supported where all three indications are documented. The guideline adds a caution about elderly patients with multiple comorbidities — address comorbidity explicitly if it applies.

Adding lumbar fusion to decompression for stenosis, without proven instability or deformity

Not Recommended. Lumbar fusion is not recommended for treatment of spinal stenosis unless concomitant instability or deformity has been proven.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Evidence (C) · confidence moderate · p. 172

Indications — required:

  • Concomitant instability or deformity has been proven

    There is no quality evidence of benefit to adding lumbar fusion to decompression. — p. 170

Not recommended unless concomitant instability or deformity has been PROVEN. The guideline states there is no quality evidence of benefit to adding fusion to decompression, and that fusion's role is to treat instability if proven present. If instability is proven, request under the spondylolisthesis/instability checklist, where the guideline sets numeric criteria.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?