Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Lumbar Denervation and Intradiscal Procedures

Derived from the ACOEM Low Back Disorders Guideline, edition 13 February 2020, as adopted into the California MTUS 23 November 2021. CPT 64635, 64636, 64633, 64634, 22526, 22527. ICD-10 M54.5, M54.50, M54.51, M54.59, M51.36, M54.30.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Presumptive Diagnosis(informational — not scored)

Required

  • Chronic low back pain, with or without radiculopathy

    Indications – Patients with chronic LBP without radiculopathy who failed conservative treatments — p. 162

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Radiofrequency neurotomy, neurotomy or facet rhizotomy for chronic low back pain

Not Recommended. Radiofrequency neurotomy, neurotomy, or facet rhizotomy are not recommended for treatment of patients with chronic LBP, including patients who are confirmed with diagnostic blocks but who do not have radiculopathy and who have failed conservative treatment.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Evidence (C) · confidence low · p. 162

Indications — required:

  • The guideline advises against this even where diagnostic blocks were positive and conservative treatment failed

    including patients who are confirmed with diagnostic blocks but who do not have radiculopathy and who have failed conservative treatment. — p. 162

Not recommended — and explicitly including patients confirmed by diagnostic blocks who do not have radiculopathy and who have failed conservative treatment. A positive diagnostic block does not move this request into a supported position; the guideline names that exact case.

Radiofrequency neurotomy, neurotomy or facet rhizotomy for other lumbar spinal conditions

Not Recommended. Radiofrequency neurotomy, neurotomy, or facet rhizotomy are not recommended for treatment of all other lumbar spinal conditions.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Evidence (C) · confidence low · p. 162

Indications — required:

  • The guideline advises against this for all other lumbar spinal conditions

    Radiofrequency neurotomy, neurotomy, or facet rhizotomy are not recommended for treatment of all other lumbar spinal conditions. — p. 162

Not recommended for all other lumbar spinal conditions. The guideline leaves no residual indication.

Radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglia for chronic sciatica

Moderately Not Recommended. Radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglia is moderately not recommended for treatment of chronic sciatica.

Strength of Evidence — Moderately Not Recommended, Evidence (B) · confidence moderate · p. 164

Indications — required:

  • The guideline moderately advises against dorsal root ganglia lesioning for chronic sciatica

    Radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglia is moderately not recommended for treatment of chronic sciatica. — p. 164

Moderately not recommended on Evidence (B) at Moderate confidence — a stronger negative than the other denervation findings.

Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET)

Not Recommended. IDET is not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain or any other back-related disorder.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · confidence low · p. 164

Indications — required:

  • The guideline advises against IDET for low back pain of any duration and for any other back-related disorder

    IDET is not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain or any other back-related disorder. — p. 164

Not recommended for acute, subacute or chronic low back pain or any other back-related disorder.

Percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PIRFT)

Moderately Not Recommended. Percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation is moderately not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain particularly including discogenic low back pain.

Strength of Evidence — Moderately Not Recommended, Evidence (B) · confidence moderate · p. 165

Indications — required:

  • The guideline moderately advises against PIRFT, naming discogenic low back pain particularly

    Percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation is moderately not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain particularly including discogenic low back pain. — p. 165

Moderately not recommended, with discogenic low back pain named particularly.

Epidural adhesiolysis (percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions)

Not Recommended. Adhesiolysis is not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain, arachnoiditis, or spinal stenosis or radicular pain syndromes.

Strength of Evidence — Not Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · confidence low · p. 168

Indications — required:

  • The guideline advises against adhesiolysis for low back pain, arachnoiditis, spinal stenosis and radicular pain syndromes

    Adhesiolysis is not recommended for treatment of acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain, arachnoiditis, or spinal stenosis or radicular pain syndromes. — p. 168

Not recommended, and the recommendation names arachnoiditis, spinal stenosis and radicular pain syndromes alongside low back pain — so failed back surgery is not a route around it. The guideline also lists it under its other names: percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions, epidural neurolysis, epidural decompressive neuroplasty and Racz neurolysis.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?