Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Mallet Finger

Derived from the ACOEM Hand, Wrist and Forearm Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 26765, 26746. ICD-10 S62.63, M20.01.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Required

  • Displaced fracture involving more than one third to one half of the articular surface of the DIP joint

    Surgical treatment with a fixation wire is recommended for patients with displaced fractures involving more than one third to one half of the articular surface of the DIP joint. — p. 385

Surgical Considerations (fixation wire)

Required

  • Fixation with a wire requested

    Surgical treatment with a fixation wire is recommended for patients with displaced fractures involving more than one third to one half of the articular surface of the DIP joint. — p. 385

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgical treatment with a fixation wire for mallet finger with a displaced fracture

Recommended.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · confidence moderate

A proportion, not a measurement: the fracture must involve MORE THAN ONE THIRD TO ONE HALF of the articular surface of the DIP joint. Get that proportion into the radiology report or state your own assessment of it — a mallet finger without a displaced fracture of that size is treated by splinting.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?