Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

California Orthopaedic AssociationMTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Lateral and Medial Epicondylalgia

Derived from the ACOEM Elbow Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 24357, 24358, 24359, 24999. ICD-10 M77.1, M77.0.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Any one of the following

  • Confirmed diagnosis of lateral epicondylalgia

    “A confirmed diagnosis of lateral epicondylalgia requires all of the following:” — p. 126

    All of the following:

    • Lateral elbow pain

      “● lateral elbow pain,” — p. 126

    • AND

      Tenderness over the lateral epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle

      “● tenderness over the lateral epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle, and” — p. 126

    • AND

      Pain with resisted wrist extension or resisted middle finger extension

      “● pain with resisted wrist extension or resisted middle finger extension.” — p. 126

  • OR

    Confirmed diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia

    “A confirmed diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia requires all of the following:” — p. 126

    All of the following:

    • Medial elbow pain

      “● medial elbow pain,” — p. 126

    • AND

      Tenderness over the medial epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle

      “● tenderness over the medial epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle, and” — p. 126

    • AND

      Pain with resisted wrist flexion

      “● pain with resisted wrist flexion.” — p. 126

Conservative Care

All of the following

  • Pain generally for at least 6 months — at least 6 months

    “● pain generally for at least 6 months , although some limited exceptions where as little as 3 months of nonoperative management may be sufficient, and” — p. 126

  • AND

    Insufficiently responsive to non-operative treatments including NSAIDs, elbow straps, stretching and strengthening exercises

    “● insufficiently responsive to non-operative treatments including NSAIDs, elbow straps, stretching and strengthening exercises” — p. 126

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgical epicondylar release for chronic epicondylalgia

Recommended. Surgical epicondylar release is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · p. 125

Indications — required:

  • Epicondylar release requested for chronic epicondylalgia

    “Any of the three main surgical approaches are acceptable pending quality trials to further direct care (open, percutaneous and arthroscopic).” — p. 126

Open, percutaneous and arthroscopic approaches are all acceptable to the guideline — it declines to prefer one pending better trials, so the approach chosen is not a ground for denial. The evidence grade is Insufficient (I), so the six months of symptoms and the failed non-operative trial are what carry the request.

Radiofrequency microtenotomy for chronic epicondylalgia

Recommended. Radiofrequency microtenotomy is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Evidence (C) · p. 127

Indications — required:

  • Radiofrequency microtenotomy requested for chronic epicondylalgia

    “Radiofrequency microtenotomy is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia” — p. 127

Microtenotomy carries a STRONGER evidence grade than open release — (C) against Insufficient (I) — on the same criteria. Worth naming explicitly if it is the procedure you intend, because the grade is the better one to be judged against.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?