Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

California Orthopaedic AssociationMTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Elbow Dislocation and Instability

Derived from the ACOEM Elbow Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 24343, 24346. ICD-10 S53.1, M24.42.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Required

  • Recurrent elbow dislocations and/or an unstable elbow after dislocation

    “Indications Recurrent elbow dislocations and/or unstable elbows after dislocation(s).” — p. 40

Surgical Considerations (stabilisation)

All of the following

  • Instability due to ligament and/or capsular damage and laxity

    “However, some have unstable joints due to ligament and/or capsular damage and laxi” — p. 40

  • AND

    Stabilisation requested

    “Surgery is recommended to repair elbow joints that either recurrently dislocate or are otherwise unstable after dislocation(s).” — p. 40

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgery for elbows that recurrently dislocate or are unstable after dislocation

Recommended.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I)

The guideline notes most patients do NOT require surgery after an elbow dislocation, so the case rests on showing this elbow is one of the exceptions: recurrent dislocation, or demonstrable instability after dislocation from ligament or capsular damage. Document the instability on examination rather than inferring it from symptoms.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?