Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Elbow Dislocation and Instability

Derived from the ACOEM Elbow Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 24343, 24346. ICD-10 S53.1, M24.42.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Required

  • Recurrent elbow dislocations and/or an unstable elbow after dislocation

    Indications Recurrent elbow dislocations and/or unstable elbows after dislocation(s). — p. 40

Surgical Considerations (stabilisation)

All of the following

  • Instability due to ligament and/or capsular damage and laxity

    However, some have unstable joints due to ligament and/or capsular damage and laxi — p. 40

  • AND

    Stabilisation requested

    Surgery is recommended to repair elbow joints that either recurrently dislocate or are otherwise unstable after dislocation(s). — p. 40

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgery for elbows that recurrently dislocate or are unstable after dislocation

Recommended.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I)

The guideline notes most patients do NOT require surgery after an elbow dislocation, so the case rests on showing this elbow is one of the exceptions: recurrent dislocation, or demonstrable instability after dislocation from ligament or capsular damage. Document the instability on examination rather than inferring it from symptoms.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?